Sarah Palin is grinning from ear-to-ear after hitting The New York Times where it really hurts

Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Newspapers have become a relic of the past as fewer Americans renew their subscriptions each year. 

Not only do newspaper subscriptions cost more than a Google search but most are heavily biased towards Democrats and constantly attack anyone who merely disagrees with them.

And Sarah Palin is grinning from ear-to-ear after hitting The New York Times where it really hurts.

A major defeat for “The Gray Lady”

The New York Times used to serve as one of America’s most trusted and widely read newspapers.

But those days have long since passed, with The Times now wearing their extreme Democrat bias on their sleeves. 

Attacking former President Donald Trump, his campaign team, and the tens of millions of Americans who support him have become their top priority. 

However, before Trump became a prominent politician, the New York Times devoted its resources to attacking other top conservatives, including former Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin. 

From the moment that former Senator John McCain (RINO-AZ) named Palin as his running mate, The Times led Democrats’ media allies on an all-out assault against her. 

Even after McCain lost in 2008, many media outlets kept up the pressure, harassing her and her family every chance they could.   

In 2017, the New York Times went as far as to blame Palin for the assassination attempt on former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ).

The Times went back to an old ad for Palin’s political action committee, showing a bullseye over the district that Giffords represented as a way of illustrating that it was one of many the group was targeting to flip into Republicans’ column.

Palin and her legal team have since taken the New York Times to court, arguing that these highly inflammatory claims defamed her. 

However, during her 2022 trial, U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff excluded evidence showing The Times’ malice, giving the jury unfair instructions. 

On Wednesday, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed that Palin could take her case back to court, giving her another chance to hold the New York Times accountable for defaming her. 

If Palin wins her case, it could cost the already struggling newspaper millions of dollars, further worsening their financial woes. 

Regardless of the outcome, the future does not look bright for the New York Times, which has struggled to hold onto to readers, and expand its digital presence. 

The New York Times represents the epitome of bias in the mainstream media 

Nearly every column the New York Times, and many other newspapers such as the Washington Post and Los Angeles Times, publishes has an extreme Democrat bias. 

Many Americans have become fed up with the lack of real news in these newspapers, which have become overrun with radical opinion pieces. 

Some media experts agree that if the New York Times does not adapt, then the entire publication could become a relic of the past in the very near future, like many other newspapers across America. 

US Political Daily will keep you updated on any developments to this ongoing story.